// Cotten Alston for CNN
Ten years earlier, in 1970, political consultant Roger Ailes had another vision of how news could operate within American politics. Against the backdrop of fading support and scandal in the Nixon administration, Ailes and fellow Nixon aides dreamt up a television enterprise that would directly promote Republican politicians and ideology, capable of shifting American perception and opinion toward conservative ideals.
In the last 20 years that picture has changed. Today, television news is watched more often
than people read newspapers,
than people listen to radio.
than people read or gather any other form of communication.
The reason: People are lazy. With television you just sit—watch—listen.
The thinking is done for you.”
// Richard Nixon Foundation
// The Ailes Files, Internet Archives
// AP Photo/Marty Lederhandler)
In the intervening three decades, Fox has solidified its role in American society and politics. It continues to frame political issues through a conservative lens, reinforcing the GOP’s agenda while providing a shared rhetorical basis for its viewers to talk about contentious political topics — While on the other side of the aisle, CNN has moved further left, providing a liberal counterpoint.
It’s far from a novel idea that American political polarization has been driven by these two powerhouses of media, but a closer look at rhetorical use offers a deeper understanding of how each network develops, sustains and frames political opinion around key issues.